{"doc_desc":{"title":"WLM","idno":"EGY_LMD_Audit_Study_V1.0","producers":[{"name":"Economic Research Forum","abbreviation":"ERF","affiliation":"","role":""}],"prod_date":"2023-11","version_statement":{"version":"Version 1.0"}},"study_desc":{"title_statement":{"idno":"EGY_LMD_Audit_Study_V1.0","title":"Egypt Labour Market Discrimination Audit Study 2023 (LMD Audit Study)"},"authoring_entity":[{"name":"Economic Research Forum","affiliation":"ERF"},{"name":"","affiliation":""}],"production_statement":{"producers":[{"name":"Economic Research Forum","affiliation":"","role":""}],"copyright":"(c) 2023, Economic Research Forum","funding_agencies":[{"name":"The International Labour Organization","abbreviation":"ILO","role":""}]},"series_statement":{"series_name":"Randomized controlled audit study of online job posting in Egypt","series_info":"Egypt's labor market is highly segmented, with women concentrated in specific occupations. Women typically earn less than men in the private sector, which is often interpreted as discrimination. This research is Egypt's first audit study, randomizing gender and marital status on applications and resumes to assess the degree of employer discrimination against women in Egypt."},"version_statement":{"version":"V1.0: Version 1 of the Egypt Labour Market Discrimination Audit Study (LMD Audit Study).","version_date":"2023-11"},"study_info":{"abstract":"Egypt's labor market is highly segmented, with women concentrated in specific occupations (Assaad, Krafft, Rahman, & Selwaness, 2019; El-Hamidi & Said, 2014). In the private sector, women typically earn less than men, even after accounting for differences in their characteristics (El-Hamidi & Said, 2014; Said, Galal, & Sami, 2022). This wage differential is often interpreted as a sign of discrimination against women but could also be driven by unobserved characteristics of women or selection into specific jobs. Norms that prioritize jobs for men over women, when jobs are scarce (Keo, Krafft, & Fedi, 2022), may also lead to employer discrimination in challenging economic times. Egyptian women frequently work in the private sector in advance of marriage and leave private sector work at marriage (Assaad, Krafft, & Selwaness, 2022; Krafft, Assaad, & Keo, 2022; Selwaness & Krafft, 2021). The degree to which exits are driven by women choosing to leave work versus employer discrimination against married women are unknown but have very different implications for interventions to improve women's employment. Generally, understanding the role of employer discrimination and the labor demand side of the market in Egyptian women's low and declining employment rates is a critical but under-researched area. There has been little research on employer discrimination and its impact on hiring in Egypt. This research is Egypt's first audit (correspondence) study, randomizing the gender and marital status on applications and resumes in order to assess the degree of employer discrimination against women in Egypt.\n===================================================================================\nFor more details please see: \nKrafft C., (2023). Do Employers Discriminate Against Married Women? Evidence from A Field Experiment in Egypt. International Labor Organization and Economic Research Forum, SWP 2023_1.\nhttps:\/\/erf.org.eg\/publications\/do-employers-discriminate-against-married-women-evidence-from-a-field-experiment-in-egypt\/\n===================================================================================","coll_dates":[{"start":"2022-06-07","end":"2022-10-05","cycle":"1"},{"start":"2022-12-08","end":"2023-02-01","cycle":"2"}],"nation":[{"name":"Egypt","abbreviation":"EGY"}],"geog_coverage":"We randomly sampled the job postings from a range of 13 online job platforms. These online platforms posted jobs available in Egypt. These 13 online platforms were the most commonly used in Egypt with enough details on the job postings. We de-duplicated postings that we found on multiple sites.","analysis_unit":"Individual-job posting level. There are four individual observations for each job posting - one single man, one single woman, one married man, one married woman.","universe":"The number of jobs taken from each website was proportional to the number of jobs on the website posted on that day. Different percentages from each platform were calculated depending on the number of jobs posted daily, and we used those percentages to create the weight variables.","data_kind":"Clinical data [cli]","notes":"Scope of the questionnaire (or gathered information) and the main topics covered:\n- Job posting information (job characteristics)\n- Personal information of applicants  (marital status, gender, age & military status)\n- Education of applicants (highest degree obtained, majors & specialization)\n- Skills of applicants (soft and technical)\n- Languages of applicants \n- Employers\u2019 responses (callbacks) to applications"},"method":{"data_collection":{"data_collectors":[{"name":"The Abdul Latif Jameel Poverty Action Lab Middle East and North Africa","abbreviation":"","affiliation":"J-PAL MENA "}],"sampling_procedure":"Sampling and weights documents: Since this is an experiment an alternative will be information about the experiment design, number of vacancies and applications (expired not expired) for example and number of responses.\n- Experiment design:\nThis audit study randomized the following characteristics of applicants:\nGender (male\/female) & Marital status (unmarried\/married)\n\nWe collected data on the occupations, industries, and educational requirements of jobs. For positions on websites that required a login and profile, first, we tried to locate the job elsewhere (e.g. on another job search website that does not require a profile, on the employer's website or elsewhere). Second, we tried to find an email for HR to send the resume. If we could not find the job anywhere that does not require a profile and cannot find an email for HR, we recorded the job characteristics, this outcome, and moved to the next position.\n\nFour resumes (one single male; one single female; one married male; one married female) were randomly generated that match the position requirements, but with the specifics randomly different (e.g. name, university attended, etc.). In order to have a manageable number of phones to answer by name, we used only sixteen first names (four for each identity combination). We selected eight common male and eight common female first names (no names that are common for both men and women). Common last names were also selected. First names were randomized across marital statuses and last names across sex and marital status. Resumes included photos. We used artificially generated (composite) photos. Women were shown wearing the hijab (photoshopped onto the generated pictures), since 95% of women aged 15-29 in Egypt wear the hijab (Population Council, 2011). Within gender, photos were randomized in creating resumes. We carefully matched the photos across gender in terms of similar apparent age, skin tone, etc., to avoid any confounders. Photos have neutral backgrounds and avoid any markers of socioeconomic status as much as possible (e.g. in hairstyle or dress). Photos were selected to plausibly cover ages 18-29.\n\nThe resumes were designed to be well-qualified for the positions in order to maximize the power of the experiment and the chances of callback (and thus be better able to assess discrimination). The resumes were sent from corresponding email addresses and with specific phone numbers for the randomly generated identity.","coll_mode":"Job Posting information are gathered online. Employers' responses are recorded by phone and by email","coll_situation":"ERF seeks IRB (Institutional Research Board) approval for all its data collection exercises to ensure the protection of the rights and welfare of human subjects participating in the research project. All interviews are conditioned upon receiving informed consent (which spells out the respondent's rights) from respondents.\n\nData were collected on all vacancies sampled, but some were excluded from the experiment. The following exclusion criteria were used:  \n1.\tPosition is in the public sector or a state-owned enterprise\n2.\tPosition is a job working outside of Egypt\n3.\tPosition is for non-Egyptians only\n4.\tPosition is a volunteering position (unpaid)\n5.\tPosition requires a minimum of more than five years of experience\n6.\tPosition is senior, executive level\n7.\tPosition has extremely specific technical requirements that are beyond our understanding to be able to create a fake resume\n8.\tPosition age range does not include 18-29\n9.\tPosition or application requires a license or certification be provided (e.g. a medical license)\n10.\tApplication requires upload of documents other than a resume and\/or cover letter (e.g. a writing sample)\n11.\tPosition is at organization requiring a profile and is NOT posted elsewhere and no HR email\n12.\tThe company name is not mentioned\/confidential\n\nBatch 1:\nTotal number of vacancies = 2,420 vacancies\nIncluded vacancies = 749 vacancies\nVacancies excluded (for the reasons above) = 1,671 vacancies\n\n\nBatch 2:\nTotal number of vacancies = 2,113 vacancies\nIncluded vacancies = 365 vacancies\nVacancies excluded (for the reasons above) = 1,748 vacancies\n \nTotal:\nTotal number of vacancies = 4,533 vacancies\nIncluded vacancies = 1,114 vacancies\nVacancies excluded (for the reasons above) = 3,419 vacancies\n\n-\tExpired\/not expired:\nSome vacancies expired before applications could be completed. \n\nBatch 1:\nExpired vacancies= 359 vacancies\nNot expired= 390 vacancies\n\nBatch 2:\nExpired vacancies= 65 vacancies\nNot expired= 320 vacancies\n\nTotal:\nExpired vacancies= 424 vacancies\nNot expired= 710 vacancies\n\n-\tSubmitted Applications:\nFour resumes were submitted per posting, except when there was a particular gender requirement for that position. \n\nBatch 1:\nSubmitted 1,470 resumes to 390 job vacancies. \n\nBatch 2:\nSubmitted 1,206 resumes to 320 job vacancies. \n\nTotal:\nSubmitted 2,676 resumes to 710 job vacancies. \n\n\n-\tCallbacks\nBatch 1:\nThe number of callbacks is 145, distributed among six different scenarios (described below). The number of callbacks distributed among the positive scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 is 95.\nBatch 2:\nThe number of callbacks is 250, distributed among six different scenarios (described below). The number of callbacks distributed among the positive scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 is 244.\n\nTotal:\nThe number of callbacks is 395, distributed among six different scenarios (described below). The number of callbacks distributed among the positive scenarios 1, 2, 3 & 4 is 339.\nS1. Scheduling an interview \nS2. Asking for additional info\nS3. Accepted without interview\nS4. Instant interview\nS5. Rejection\nS6. Not able to get reviewed (this is a scenario where the RAs used to receive a reply from the employer to send the CV using the online profile of the platform, where the job position is advertised on. OR the RAs received an automatic email that the mailbox of the employer is full.)","weight":"Weights were generated for each platform based on the sampling rate for that platform. Weights were the inverse of the sampling probability times the number of workers required for the posting."}},"data_access":{"dataset_use":{"conf_dec":[{"txt":"To access the micro-data, researchers are required to register on the ERF website and comply with the data access agreement. The data will be used only for scholarly, research, or educational purposes. Users are prohibited from using data acquired from the Economic Research Forum in the pursuit of any commercial or private ventures.","required":"yes","form_no":"","uri":""}],"contact":[{"name":"Economic Research Forum","affiliation":"ERF","email":"erfdataportal@erf.org.eg","uri":"www.erf.org.eg"}],"cit_req":"The users should cite the Economic Research Forum as follows:\n\"OAMDI, 2023. Egypt Labour Market Discrimination Audit Study (LMD Audit Study) 2023, http:\/\/www.erfdataportal.com\/index.php\/catalog. Version 1.0 of the licensed data files; LMD Audit Study, Egypt: Economic Research Forum (ERF).\u201d","conditions":"Licensed datasets, accessible under conditions.","disclaimer":"The Economic Research Forum has granted the researcher access to relevant data following exhaustive efforts to protect the confidentiality of individual data. The researcher is solely responsible for any analysis or conclusions drawn from available data."}}},"schematype":"survey"}